Browse our collection of adventure reviews and ratings.Showing 12 of 12 reviews.
Swiss Army Man is honestly one of the strangest and most unexpectedly heartfelt adventure films I've ever seen. The premise alone — a man stranded on a deserted island befriends a flatulent corpse — sounds deliberately odd, but the directors (Daniels) use that weirdness to dig into some surprisingly deep themes of loneliness and connection. Paul Dano and Daniel Radcliffe have such unpredictable, perfect chemistry, somehow making the bizarre absolutely compelling. What really stood out for me was how visually creative the whole movie is. The cinematography makes a washed-out forest or a makeshift raft feel dreamlike, and the soundtrack has this weird, acapella energy that matches the tone perfectly. There are moments where the camera almost twirls around its subjects, adding this childlike sense of wonder, even during scenes that could easily have been gross out or off-putting. The story isn’t always easy to predict, and honestly, the emotional beats sneak up on you. There are a few stretches where the movie feels a little too committed to its oddness — almost as if it's trying a bit too hard to shock or amuse. Not every joke lands, but when the film hits you with a tender moment, it's genuinely affecting. Daniel Radcliffe’s performance as the corpse is so committed; he manages to be both hilarious and oddly moving with the minimal tools he has to work with. Paul Dano gives his character an awkward resilience that makes you root for him, even as things get more surreal. It's definitely a film that isn't afraid to take risks, both tonally and narratively. You would enjoy this if you're up for something that’s not only adventurous in its plot but in its filmmaking, and you don’t mind a big dose of absurdity with your emotion. It’s a great pick for people who liked movies like "Hunt for the Wilderpeople" or "Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind," but want something even less conventional.
Alright, so Jungle Cruise is basically Disney taking another swing at turning a theme park ride into a summer blockbuster, like they did with Pirates of the Caribbean, but swapping pirates for a pulpy, rain-soaked Amazon adventure. It stars Emily Blunt as a buttoned-up British scientist, Dr. Lily Houghton, and Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson as the charming riverboat captain with a suspiciously clean shirt. The plot feels a little like Indiana Jones Lite - searching for a magical healing tree, outsmarting cartoonish villains, navigating treacherous waters. One thing that genuinely works is the chemistry between Emily Blunt and The Rock. They have that fun, slightly bickering energy that reminds me of Rachel Weisz and Brendan Fraser in The Mummy. Johnson's dad jokes are groanworthy but delivered with enough charm that you eventually just roll with it. And Blunt sells the whole daring-scholar-on-a-mission vibe better than the script deserves. I wish the movie let them lean more into screwball antics, though, rather than trying to play everything so big and bombastic. Visually, Jungle Cruise is all over the map. There are some shots where the lush jungle actually looks, well, lush - lots of waterfalls, vibrant greenery, cool ancient ruins. But then the CG starts to get a little slippery, especially with the supernatural twist about halfway through. Some of the effects look like they were borrowed from an old video game. You can almost hear the computer fans whirring behind the scenes. The pacing is relentless, which is both a blessing and a curse. It never really lags, but it also never allows the quieter moments to breathe. You can feel the studio notes in places, like someone was terrified that kids in the audience would get bored if there was even a ten-second lull. The result is two hours of non-stop quips, jumps, peril, and people falling dramatically from high places. After a while, it starts to feel numbing. On the emotional side, the movie only goes skin deep. There are attempts at backstory and some surprisingly progressive twists for Disney, but nothing hits very hard. The villain (Jesse Plemons doing his best Werner Herzog impression) is goofy in a way that undercuts any sense of actual danger. I never once worried for the leads, which kind of robs the story of tension. In the end, Jungle Cruise is a passable, crowd-pleasing adventure that’s entertaining in the moment but forgettable when the credits roll. If you’re looking for a throwback romp and can forgive a heaping helping of CG chaos, it’s a decent popcorn watch. Just don’t expect anything to linger after the ride stops.
I’ll admit it: going into The Lost City, I wasn’t expecting much more than a light, slightly awkward adventure. It’s basically a Sandra Bullock and Channing Tatum vehicle, with Daniel Radcliffe popping in as a delightfully unhinged villain. Think Romancing the Stone, but way more self-aware and a lot sillier. The premise is simple enough. Sandra Bullock is a romance novelist who gets swept up in a wild jungle quest when Radcliffe’s billionaire thinks her books might actually lead to real treasure. What I loved is how Bullock and Tatum don’t take themselves too seriously. She’s buttoned-up and miserable; he’s the clueless cover model who doesn’t have a clue how actual danger works. The banter is genuinely funny, especially when the film lets them riff naturally. Where The Lost City loses steam is in the plotting. There’s barely any real mystery and most of the “adventure” is just riffing on genre tropes. They’re chased, they argue, Tatum looks offended by leeches, rinse and repeat. The middle chunk of the film sags, and you can see some set pieces straining to feel epic, but everything is just a touch too clean and safe. Visually, though, it’s vibrant and easy to watch. The filmmakers lean into lush greens and bright jungle colours, and even when things get ridiculous, you don’t mind because the energy stays up. The stunts are forgettable, but the costume choices (Bullock in a glitter onesie, flailing through mud) are almost slapstick gold. The big surprise is how sweet the chemistry is. I never expected to root for these two weirdos fumbling through a jungle, but there’s real charm in their awkwardness. Radcliffe’s villain is pure comedy and honestly feels like he wandered in from an SNL sketch, but that fits the movie’s breezy style. Brad Pitt’s cameo is genuinely the funniest section. Overall, this is the kind of movie you throw on when you want low-stakes fun with faces you like. It’s not reinventing anything and it definitely runs out of ideas before the credits roll, but it’s good for a goofy laugh and a colourful escape. Pure popcorn stuff, with Bullock carrying the adventure on sheer charisma alone.
The Mummy is one of those adventure movies that knows it’s a bit ridiculous and has a blast anyway. Brendan Fraser plays Rick O'Connell, a roguish explorer with just the right mix of charm and smartassery, and he’s honestly the reason this movie works so well. Set in 1920s Egypt, the plot zips around cursed tombs, plagues, and undead priests, but it never feels like it’s taking itself too seriously. What really sticks with me is how perfectly paced it is. The first act moves quickly without feeling rushed, letting you care about the characters (shoutout to Rachel Weisz for making Evelyn genuinely lovable). By the time everyone gets to Hamunaptra and the chaos erupts, you’re already invested, so the bigger action set pieces actually land instead of just being noise. It’s also way funnier than it has any right to be. There are so many quotable lines and little physical comedy bits that still hold up. The script gives its leads room to play, and the chemistry between Fraser and Weisz is surprisingly sweet. John Hannah as the comic relief brother can get a bit grating, but it works about 80% of the time. The effects are a funny mixed bag. Some of the CGI is delightfully late-90s (the scarab beetles are weirdly memorable), but the practical sets and creature work have aged better than I expected. The big Imhotep moments look dated now, but honestly? It adds to the pulpy charm instead of taking away from it. I do think the emotional stakes could be a little sharper. There’s a love story and some “world-ending” danger, but it never hits as hard as, say, Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade. It’s more popcorn than pathos, but when popcorn is this well-made, who cares? Twenty-plus years later, The Mummy is still perfect rainy-day viewing. It’s breezy, goofy, and a bit nostalgic, with just enough edge to keep it interesting. Don’t overthink it - just enjoy the ride.
"Tracks" is one of those quietly mesmerizing adventure films you don't hear about much but should. It follows Robyn Davidson’s real-life, solo trek across 1,700 miles of Australian desert in 1977, with just her dog and four camels for company. The sheer landscape is a character of its own - endless sand, burnt orange palettes, bruised skies - and watching Mia Wasikowska disappear into it is both hypnotic and nerve-wracking. What stands out most is Wasikowska’s portrayal of Robyn. She nails the combination of resolve and vulnerability, making the audience root for her even when you can’t always fully grasp what drives her. Adam Driver pops up as the awkwardly endearing National Geographic photographer, a nice counterpoint, though he mostly hovers at the story’s edge. The movie avoids turning Robyn into a quirky eccentric or a superhero - she just wants solitude, despite the world not letting her fade into the background. Some viewers might find the pacing a bit meditative - there’s a lot of walking, reflecting, and very little action. But I found it fitting; the film wants you to feel the length and gravity of her journey. The cinematography is honestly stunning. Director John Curran drenches every frame in color and light to underline both the beauty and harshness of the Outback. If there’s anything lacking, it’s maybe a deeper look into Robyn’s psyche. She’s guarded, and while that’s authentic to the real Davidson, sometimes it keeps the film at arm’s length emotionally. Still, that sense of distance mirrors the isolation of the trek and sets it apart from more melodramatic adventure movies. You would enjoy this if you liked introspective adventures (think "Into the Wild" minus the self-destruction), films led by quietly strong performances, and stories set against jaw-dropping natural backdrops. It’s not for thrill-seekers, but it’s gripping in its own raw, lyrical way.
The Eagle is a historical adventure film set in Roman Britain, following a young Roman officer, Marcus Aquila, as he sets out with his slave Esca to recover his father's lost legion's golden eagle standard. What I really liked about it is how it leans into the moody, muddy, windswept vibe of the British frontier - the locations feel gritty and you can almost smell the damp forests and old stone. It doesn’t glamorize the period, and that main quest, while simple, feels appropriately epic as they push deeper into dangerous, unfamiliar land. Channing Tatum takes the lead, and while he’s probably not what I usually imagine when I think "Roman centurion," he brings a gruff earnestness to Marcus. Jamie Bell, as Esca, is probably the highlight - he gives his character a complexity that makes you question whose side you’re really on. Their relationship forms the heart of the film, fluctuating between respect, suspicion, and genuine friendship, and it’s handled with more nuance than I expected. The action set pieces are solid if not mind-blowing - the film definitely relies more on tension and atmosphere than on huge battles. There are some really nice wide shots and long takes that bring out the hostility of the terrain, and the threat of the tribes is kept more mysterious than cartoonishly evil. The decision to not use subtitles for the native tribes' language actually adds to that unease in a cool way. On the downside, the pacing can drag in the middle, especially if you’re expecting constant adventure. Some of the dialogue is predictable, and a few supporting characters felt a little one-note. Also, if you're a stickler for exact historical accuracy, there are definitely liberties - it's more about the mythic quest than a true history lesson. You would enjoy this if you’re into serious-toned historical adventures, especially ones that take the “men on a mission” concept and give it an old-school cinematic feel. It's for fans who like character-driven journeys with moral ambiguity, rather than just non-stop action or big Hollywood spectacle.
So Jurassic Park III is the one where Alan Grant gets tricked into going back to Isla Sorna by a desperate couple looking for their lost son. The plot is pretty straightforward, and it wastes no time getting the group into dinosaur-fueled peril (honestly, they’re on the island within fifteen minutes). If you’re hoping for a nostalgia trip with the return of Sam Neill as Dr. Grant, you’ll get a kick out of seeing him trying to survive another dinosaur disaster. What really stood out to me is the introduction of the Spinosaurus, which immediately establishes itself as the new apex predator - there’s a scene early on that basically says, “move aside, T. rex.” There are some genuinely tense moments, especially involving the raptors, whose designs and intelligence are played up even more than before. The film delivers a good handful of dino-action set pieces; if you’re just here for the dinosaurs, you won’t be disappointed. On the downside, the story feels thin compared to the earlier films. There’s not much of a sense of awe or wonder - just a lot of running, screaming, and near-misses. The characters, while likable enough, don’t really get much development beyond what the plot demands. I missed some of the ethical debates and science-y undertones from the first two movies. Cinematography-wise, the movie makes the most out of its jungle setting with plenty of dynamic camera work during chase scenes. There are a few CGI moments that haven’t aged gracefully, but practical effects (especially on the raptors) still look impressive. The pace is brisk, so it never really drags, which is honestly a plus given the story’s simplicity. You would enjoy this if you’re in the mood for a fast-paced, no-frills dinosaur adventure and don’t mind a movie that skips deep themes in favor of non-stop action. Also, if you’re a fan of Sam Neill or just want more Jurassic dino-chaos, it’s definitely worth a watch - even if it doesn’t quite reach the heights of the original.
If you haven't seen "The Lost City of Z," it's a historical adventure that follows British explorer Percy Fawcett as he plunges into the Amazon in search of an ancient, rumored civilization. What grabbed me first was how grounded and meditative it felt for an expedition film; it's less about action and more about Fawcett’s obsession and what it costs him personally. Charlie Hunnam delivers a surprisingly nuanced performance, and the supporting cast (Robert Pattinson, Tom Holland) feels authentic within the muddy, claustrophobic setting. Visually, the movie is stunning - lush, oppressive jungles and coffee-hued rivers that feel both inviting and dangerous. There’s an old-school, almost dreamlike feel to the whole thing that reminded me a bit of Werner Herzog’s "Aguirre," but it’s more restrained and introspective. Director James Gray leans hard into the melancholy and ambiguity, making you question at every step whether Fawcett’s quest is heroic or just self-destructive. If you go in expecting nonstop action, it might drag in places - the pacing is deliberate and the plot’s more about the internal journey. But if you're into slow-burn, beautifully shot adventures with a true-story hook and a taste for ambiguous endings, this one deserves your time. It's perfect for fans of thoughtful biopics and exploration tales.
This is one of those charming, quietly adventurous movies that sneaks up on you. "The Peanut Butter Falcon" follows a young man with Down syndrome, Zak, who escapes his care home to pursue his dream of becoming a wrestler, eventually teaming up with an outlaw played by Shia LaBeouf. The film unfolds along the rivers and backwoods of the American South, blending a Mark Twain-style journey with modern themes of inclusion and friendship. What really stood out to me was the chemistry between the leads, especially between Zak (played by Zack Gottsagen) and Shia LaBeouf’s character. Their oddball, heartfelt friendship feels genuine without tipping into cliché, and Dakota Johnson also brings warmth to her role as Zak’s caregiver. The Southern landscape forms its own character - sunny swamps, dusty roads, and a sense of freedom and possibility. The plot isn’t exactly groundbreaking, and if you’re after big action set pieces or intricate plotting, you might find it a little slow in places. That said, for anyone who loves road movies and stories about unlikely companionship, this is a gentle, feel-good adventure that does what it sets out to do with a lot of heart.
This is a 2010 adventure drama based on the incredible, supposedly true story of a group of prisoners who escape from a Siberian gulag and trek thousands of miles across some of the harshest terrains on earth to find freedom. It’s less about big action and more about survival - you really feel the exhaustion and grit as they trudge through deserts, mountains, and forests. The cinematography is a gorgeous tour of just how overwhelming and indifferent nature can be. What really stood out for me was the cast. Ed Harris, Colin Farrell, and Saoirse Ronan each bring a sense of desperation, hope, and sometimes madness to their characters. There’s also this tension throughout the film: not just from the physical danger but also from the group dynamics, trust issues, and personal secrets. Every few scenes, you get a reminder that humans can endure almost anything if they have a reason to keep going. If I’m nitpicking, the movie sometimes struggles with its pacing - it can drag in the middle and some of the characters feel a bit underdeveloped. But if you’re in the mood for an old-school adventure with a huge dose of survival realism (and beautiful, bleak landscapes), this is a solid pick. It’s especially good for folks who like character-driven journeys more than blockbuster spectacle.
"The Adventures of TinTin" is a 90's animated television series based on the beloved comic books created by Belgian author Hergé. This series really captures the essence of the original material and retains the charming and exciting spirit of the books. TinTin, along with his trusty dog Snowy, takes us on thrilling global adventures while solving mysteries, uncovering hidden treasures, and battling evil forces. The show's animation style is something to mention - it's classic, unpretentious, and will give you nostalgic memories if you're a kid from the 90's. Another amazing fact is the voice acting. I thoroughly enjoyed how the character's personalities were captured, especially Captain Haddock, with his boisterous nature and colorful metaphors, and the punctilious and occasionally hilariously disorganized Detective Twins Thompson and Thomson. A slight drawback is that the series doesn't delve much into TinTin's backstory; he seems to exist solely for his adventures. Nevertheless, if you're a fan of animated television series that mixes excitement with comedy and wit or if you're someone who enjoyed the original books, I think you will definitely enjoy this series.
"The Fall" is an exceptionally artistic adventure fantasy film that presents a story within a story. Directed by Tarsem Singh, known for his visually sensational films, "The Fall" magnificently interweaves two plots, both narrated by Roy, a stuntman played by Lee Pace. Set in the 1920s in a Los Angeles hospital, the film follows Pace's character, bedridden and heartbroken after a professional stunt goes wrong, as he seeks solace in storytelling to a young, Romanian-immigrant girl. Each of Roy's tales, spun to win the girl's confidence, is visually gorgeous, taking the viewer to five different exotic locales. The cinematography is truly a feast for the eyes, with splendid colors, intricate costumes, dream-like imaginations, and a Steinbeck-esque take on the allure of storytelling. Meanwhile, the offbeat portrayal of heroism, love, and sacrifice in these tales draws you in and leaves you ever more engaged. "The Fall" is a wonderful cinematic experience that boldly blurs the lines between illusion and reality, hope and despair, and love and manipulation. It evokes strong emotion from viewers, inviting them into the magic of storytelling in its raw form. This film is a real gem that, sadly, many movie-goers have overlooked. Its poignant metaphoric narrative, embellished with breathtaking visuals, assures a uniquely rewarding viewing experience that I would highly recommend.